Starting in the latter half of the 1980s, as reforms began under the Sąjūdis movement and calls for independence increased, a modernist hyperreality of multiplying images thrived uniquely in the graphic arts. While the apologists of darkness seemed to create their own, unique imagery in their works, these new, deceptively realistic imaginary worlds appeared to multiply of their own accord, fed by external sources and media.
The exact drawing of objects observed in their natural state is perhaps only possible when rendering simple still lifes of durable, three-dimensional objects, for example, which was precisely the field of activity embraced by the Lithuanian painter Algimantas Švėgžda, who moved to East Berlin in 1982 for health reasons. Artists seeking to create extremely realistic depictions of their subjects, however, usually relied on photographs. The pursuit of the illusion of reality depends on copying, repetition and referencing, which in turn calls for a retrospective approach and the selection and matching method that characterized the era of new media. Improvisation and surprise become essential in the assembly of bizarre and mystical imagery from carefully sketched realistic elements.
In his sketches of hyperrealistic domestic scenes created with pencil and watercolors (and later duplicated by lithograph), Audrius Puipa relied on photographs, sometimes even models (especially animals), tracing imagery from magazines or assembling them from various different pieces. The action in his works usually takes place in artists’ studios or in the kitchens of relatives or acquaintances. His kitchens usually feature people bathing, while his studios containe characters eating or preparing meals. One scene assembles living and long dead historical figures together with imagined characters. These compositions, assembled from different pieces and redrawn studies, seem to illustrate a consistent and seamless three-dimensional space, but the selection and matching method reveals itself through the different sizes of objects and figures, threads of imagery, and unfinished portions of the work.
Puipa also includes written comments about the curious and mysterious stories in his pictures:
Two family friends, Zdyska and Puipa, sit atop a dresser. Klimas was even blinded by the glow.
Šventos Dvasios pasirodymas Klimų bute
(The Appearance of the Holy Spirit in the Klimas’ Apartment), 1985
Šarūnas Sauka drinks vodka behind a column, overcome by glory and his [national] award. […] On the left, Šarūnas Leonavičius sits and studies the Atlantic Ocean, preparing to set sail to America. In another corner, two drunkards exit the scene with a stolen Sližys painting. Sližys himself stands slicing meat for his birthday.
Raimundo Sližio dirbtuvė (The Studio of Raimundas Sližys), 1990
Šarūnas is found with a girl by his mother and father. The elder Leonavičius looks at his son with reproach…
Šarūno kambarys (Šarūnas’ Room), 1993
In the lithographs created by Rimvydas Bartkus (who emigrated from Vilnius to New York in 1991) in his youth, reality appears magically strange: something not quite right seems to be happening in an otherwise routine scene and daily life transforms into a painting viewed through a distorted lens.
Snippets of Lithuanian history or photographs discovered in family albums in Giedrius Jonaitis’ lithographs, etchings and drypoint prints transform into disturbing universes and eternal fantasies. The bell tower of St. Anne’s Church, fettered at the base with a knight’s armor and the skeleton of a giant fish with a dead wolf’s head, flies through the endless space of the cosmos among unknown planets and mysterious machines. Jonaitis often also portrays his face—small, large, winged, or with a bird emerging from a shell—always staring into the eyes of the viewer. Animated images of the world’s end, of weightlessness and change, also possess characteristics common to religious and heroic paintings, as well as science fiction cinema elements, sometimes resembling living organisms. It is no coincidence that these images were later reproduced in animated films. From 1991 to 2007, Jonaitis worked on the designs for the Lithuanian currency, the litas, collaborating in the production of all of the banknote issues for the 1, 2, 10, and 500 litas notes, as well as in two series for the 20 and 50 litas notes.
The compositions of tiny figures and multi-layered swarms of images in a series of etchings created by Šarūnas Leonavičius between 1989 and 2000 have a clear association to one prototype: the altar paintings of the Northern Renaissance. The retrospective nature of his illustrations for a 2013 publication of Kristijonas Donelaitis’ The Seasons were also heavily influenced by the work itself, or more precisely, by the era in which it was written.
Similar influences shaped illustrations for a 1988 Lithuanian edition of Dante’s Divine Comedy by Vytautas Kalinauskas, who represented a more senior generation of artists than that of Audrius Puipa. On the book’s flyleaf we see an illustration of a model of the world—a sketch of hell, purgatory and heaven—that with its quasi-scientific approach has much in common with the Renaissance. The diagram and its component sketches feature precisely rendered, naked, proportional and muscular figures posed at complex angles in various movements. Sometimes their shapes are distorted, as if viewed through a lens. The figures are linked by dotted lines to polished jewels and heavenly bodies. Traces of bituminous varnish, acids and other materials create an ever lighter background, symbolizing natural disasters and the physical world, while geometry here represents that world’s invisible system of order. Man finds himself between these elements. As in the works of many other artists, bodies fly about free from the force of gravity, though some of them are aided by wings.
The repetition of historical means of expression in graphic art work created in the final decade of the 20th century intertwines with parodies of these same styles. In their old-fashioned etchings, Gediminas Leonavičius, Rolandas Rimkūnas, and Žygimantas Augustinas do not present objects borrowed from Dürer, Rembrandt or Goya as direct citations and make no effort to fashion narratives to justify their use. In one work, biblical stories are confused and transformed into hallucinations, while another piece replaces figures from classical paintings with cats, dogs or Mickey Mouse. In a third example, the artist mocks visions of darkness and weightlessness by transforming them into the overcrowded nightmares of rather repugnant personalities.
Comments
Write a comment